我很在乎

【首发于公众号 写作疑难杂症诊疗室】I Care A Lot 一句话影评： The storytelling is so good, acting so good, until you realize the story is so … 三观不正 😤 If you are intrigued by Rosamond Pike’s unfeeling, first-rate psychopathic smart bitch in Gone Girl, then you will watch I Care a Lot as soon as you have the chance. Well, that’s what I did. And it was the first movie I watched in 2023 — by Jove, how it angered me. Two minutes into the movie, it is living up to the poster’s promise of badass-ness. Pike plays Marla Grayson, who does the voice-over in the opening monologue synopsizing her worldview: this is a world of either winners or losers, predators or prey, lions or lambs. Black or white, no middle ground. An all too familiar worldview to the point of hackneyed, but Pike’s delivery, her cadence, is top-notch. In this strictly dichotomous world, Marla declares: “I am not a lamb. I am a fucking lioness.”Suspense is a foundational trick to hold the audience’s attention. The opening scene does this by the discord between what you see on the screen and what you hear. You hear Marla briefing you on her Ayn Randian philosophy (which has a lot of avid supporters in the far right, something to keep in mind when thinking about why the movie is terrible), but you see images of an orderly care facility where the staff seem attentive to the elderly, and then a disheveled, chubby man trying to break into the facility, only to be quickly seized by some brawny guards. If you are minimally familiar with the science of storytelling, you know that suspense helps to release dopamine, the so-called happiness hormone. When you anticipate a reward, in the case of storytelling, when you expect that everything will be accounted for by the end of the movie, your brain produces dopamine. This opening scene is your first shot of dopamine. The next scene quickly explains what is going on. We are now in a courtroom. Turns out, the mother of the disheveled man, Feldstrom, is in the care facility, to which he is denied access. The court appoints Marla as his mother’s guardian, giving her license to deny Feldstrom visits to his own mother. Marla is also entitled to sell the mother’s house, car, valuable belongings and then use the money to pay herself for her service as the court-appointed guardian. If this sounds crooked, it is. Feldstrom adds that Marla is a total stranger both to him and his mother, and his mother has explicitly said that she doesn’t want to be put in a care facility. Just when you think Marla is the bad guy in the story, here comes the twist. Marla defends herself, first by portraying the son as irresponsible: “Your mother couldn’t cope on her own. A doctor diagnosed her with dementia, Mr Feldstrom, and wrote an affidavit recommending immediate action be take for her safety. You have amply opportunity to move your mother into a care facility or into your home. You did neither.” When parents abuse or for whatever reason can’t take proper care of their children, we think it reasonable for the government and the judicial system to step in. The same goes to elderly who aren’t properly cared for. So far so good, Marla seems reasonable. When Feldstrom objects to Marla’s accusation by saying that her mother begged not to be taken to a care facility, Marla makes a clever distinction: “You can’t care for her by doing what she wants. You have to do what she needs. And that is why I can care better than a family member because I have no skin in the game. … yes, I oversaw the sale of some of her assets to finance [her bills in the care facility], and yes, I pay myself, too, because caring, sir, is my job. … All-day, every day, I care.” You have to admire the concision in her speech, her dazzling use of differentiation, addressing counterargument, and appealing to ethos. And it makes sense. Kids surely want all the sugar they can get and more. But that’s not what they need. The same logic applies to those with dementia. Marla becomes less the greedy predator preying on the vulnerable, and more the strong-willed businesswoman who does what might seem ruthless but necessary. She continues: “I care for those who are in need of protection. Protection from apathy, protection from their own pride, and quite often, protection from their own children. … offspring, who are willing to let their parents starve in squalor and struggle with pain rather than dip into what they see as their inheritance to pay for the necessary care.” By this point, we begin to suspect that Feldstrom is actually the greedy one. At the same time, Marla’s argumentation is so tactical, the intonation so calculated, that it just lacks authenticity. You can’t be entirely sure: is Marla a good guy, or a bad guy? There, uncertainty over the main character — you have your second shot of dopamine. With questions like this, we keep watching. Mind you, this is only less than seven minutes into the movie, and Feldstrom has gone from being the bad guy to the not so bad guy and then again the bad (in the sense of incompetent) guy, and the ruthless Marla with her problematic worldview becomes a respectable professional. 这么紧凑的人物翻转制造了「爽剧」的效果。

不得不佩服好莱坞故事产业的成熟。

The next scene, we see Marla Grayson walking down the stairs outside the courthouse, with full-on badassery. Feldstrom comes after her. He is wearing a red cap again. Looks like he can be a Trump supporter. And he’s calling her “bitch.” He’s in a rage. Words are flushing out of his mouth: “I hope you get raped, and I hope you get murdered, and I hope you get killed!” And he spits on her face. His vulgarity is complete. But his anger also makes you think that he’s truly the victim. Feldstrom is surely an uncivilized, undereducated person for losing his cool like that, but … it could be you — you may have said something similar on social media, in response to some monster doing something flagrantly dehumanizing… Again, you are not sure whether Marla is the good guy or bad guy, and therefore you are not sure if Feldstrom’s outburst is justified. And here comes the problematic part. Marla takes off her sunglasses and looks ferociously into Feldstrom’s eyes: “Does it sting more because I’m a woman? That you got so soundly beaten in there by someone with a vagina? Having a penis doesn’t automatically make you more scary to me, just the opposite. You may be a man, but if you ever threaten, touch or spit on me again… I will grab your dick and balls and I will rip them clean off, you understand? I’ll tell your mom you send your best.” This is a calculated move to make the female audience feel so good, no? You had been belittled at least once, so indelibly, just because you are a girl/woman, and this is exactly what you wanted to say to the offender had you had the guts (which you didn’t). So hearing Marla say that so collectedly just makes you feel wonderful. If you feel that way, that’s due to something called mirror neurons, “brain cells that fire not only when we perform an action but when we observe someone else perform the same action.” 看节目主持人在享受美食的时候，自己也馋了，即使你的理性告诉你那不是真正的食物，而是像素构成的幻影。

But how are men reacting to the scene? Could be something totally different. It could frighten the male audience. When you feel threatened and stressed out, you also become more focused. Scientists have long discovered that even when we don’t face a direct physical threat, as long as we begin to imagine those threats, we get stressed out, and thus more focused. You can identify with Feldstrom and feel intimidated by Marla. Or you can feel frightened for Marla in anticipation of Feldstrom’s fightback. Or, it can be that the masculine part of you feels threatened, and the feminine part of you feels elated. If you can simultaneously feel these two things, oh boy, you are getting the optimal experience. Cortisol is the attention hormone, and oxytocin the bonding hormone. Cortisol combined with oxytocin can give you the experience of transportation (“transport” in the sense of being overwhelmed “with a strong emotion, especially joy”). The second time watching this scene, though, I just rolled my eyes at Marla, because in the next eighteen minutes, the good-guy-bad-guy suspense is completely resolved. The next eighteen minutes show you how Marla capitalizes on the loopholes in the medical and legal system, how she takes advantage of the human weakness of automatically following orders and trusting authority figures, how she preys on those with insufficient legal resources, and what she claims as “care” is actually just grift. As in Gone Girl, Pike once again plays the female villain character in I Care A Lot. Only this time, her character Marla is a lesbian, which frees her from the obligation of playing along with the modern, enlightened men’s fantasy about modern, enlightened women. Marla can express her contempt for men explicitly, whereas in Gone Girl the Cool Girl Amy has to convey her contempt through elaborate schemes. It is really worth the while to revisit the famed Cool Girl passage in Gone Girl, for those too young to have watched or heard of the film:That night at the Brooklyn party, I was playing the girl who was in style, the girl a man like Nick wants: the Cool Girl. Men always say that as the defining compliment, don’t they? She’s a cool girl. Being the Cool Girl means I am a hot, brilliant, funny woman who adores football, poker, dirty jokes, and burping, who plays video games, drinks cheap beer, loves threesomes and anal sex, and jams hot dogs and hamburgers into her mouth like she’s hosting the world’s biggest culinary gang bang while somehow maintaining a size 2, because Cool Girls are above all hot. Hot and understanding. Cool Girls never get angry; they only smile in a chagrined, loving manner and let their men do whatever they want. Go ahead, shit on me, I don’t mind, I’m the Cool Girl. Men actually think this girl exists. Maybe they’re fooled because so many women are willing to pretend to be this girl...Oh, and if you’re not a Cool Girl, I beg you not to believe that your man doesn’t want the Cool Girl. It may be a slightly different version—maybe he’s vegetarian, so Cool Girl loves seitan and is great with dogs; or maybe he’s a hipster artist, so Cool Girl is a tattooed, bespectacled nerd who loves comics. There are variations to the window dressing, but believe me, he wants Cool Girl, who is basically the girl who likes every f***ing thing he likes and doesn’t ever complain. (How do you know you’re not Cool Girl? Because he says things like “I like strong women.” If he says that to you, he will at some point f*** someone else. Because “I like strong women” is code for “I hate strong women.” Gone Girl is invested in the plight of contemporary women, while I Care A Lot is not — the pseudo-feminist things Marla says only bring cheap gratification. Cool Girl Amy’s transgression consists of framing men for stalking, rape, and murder, of putting men to social death and behind bars. But Marla’s seeming transgression of heteronormative sexuality is only a masquerade for her real transgression: her subscription to a macho capitalist logic. Let me quickly sum up the rest of I Care A Lot. Marla collides with a doctor to induce signs of dementia in a rich old lady. Then Marla becomes the legal guardian of that rich old lady, Jennifer Peterson. But Jennifer turns out to be the mother of a super rich and powerful Russian man, Roman, whose business includes human trafficking. Roman kills the doctor and makes it look like suicide, in an attempt to frighten Marla into forfeiting her guardianship on his mother. Marla remains undaunted. So Roman tries to kill Marla, and fails; he tries to kill Marla’s girlfriend Fran, and also fails. The two failed attempts are irritating, I know, because they just make the story implausible. And it gets more irritating. Set on go big or go home, Marla gets back at Roman, and succeeds: she miraculously becomes Roman’s legal guardian, and puts a $10 million price tag on Roman’s freedom. Here comes another twist. Roman proposes an alternative to the $10 million: “Instead of me giving you $10 million… we become partners, go into business together. … I hate you… but, oh, the money we could make. You’re a rare person, Marla. Your determination is… Frankly, it’s scary. But this guardianship grift, it’s ripe, but right now it’s small potatoes. I propose we create a monster… a countrywide guardianship corporation, with you as CEO and co-owner. Use my money, use your… skills. Destroy the competition. Take control of the entire market.”Yes, the two persons that for the most part of the movie try to kill each other become business partners at the end! Two absolutely depraved capitalists joining forces! 没有永远的敌人，不要跟钱过不去 — 这是整部电影的底层逻辑。

The director/scriptwriter must have this twist, which veers the theme of the movie toward the triumph of capitalism, to sustain audience engagement and achieve its own capitalist, commercial success. Obscene!And brace yourself for the most f**ked-up part of the movie. Marla accepts the partnership and achieves CEO of a publicly traded company level of success at the age of 39. She just finishes a TV interview and she’s walking to her car. Feldstrom walks up to her and fires gunshot at her heart. Feldstrom never gets to see his mom and his mom just died alone in the care facility. So he shoots Marla in the heart. This time, Marla completely fails to fire back with words. It is implied that she is killed on the spot. I was screaming (in my head) at this point. A f**king greedy, immoral capitalist, empowered by another wealthy, immoral capitalist, unstopped by the court and the government, or rather, aided by the incompetent people in the legal system and corrupted doctors, only to be killed by an incel kind of guy? The only effective solution to ending injustice and capitalist avarice is pure gun violence in the most American style? As the closing credits music begins, I was yelling in my head: NO! That CAN’T be how the story ends! Movies are supposed to satisfy viewers’ deepest fantasies, and this one does not satisfy my fantasy that justice can be restored through nonviolent, rational means, through legal measures, and through investigative journalism. After all that shit that happened in 2022, after all those people that disappeared, this is the last movie I needed. I wanted movies to represent messy reality, not this kind of bullshit fairytale. I was so angry that I even began to suspect the director/scriptwriter is some sort of closeted Republican incel funded by far-right groups. I realized I needed Spotlight kind of movies. After watching the movie, I spent an hour watching videos about Elizabeth Holmes.

要问哪个外国明星是发自内心，实打实的喜欢中国文化。

那裴淳华女士必须当仁不让。

不仅在脱口秀上传授老外中国民间俗语——

还用全中文录制牛年春节祝福，问候广大中国影迷。

单从名字来说，没有点国学底蕴真起不出这寓意满满的民国名媛风。

写出来更是让人惊叹姐姐的一手好字。

最近裴姐可谓人逢喜事精神爽，刚刚拿下了金球奖影后桂冠。

今天咱就来聊聊这部封后之作——

裴淳华饰演的玛拉是一位职业监护人。

这种职业依托于美国的“法定监护人”制度，被认定为无行为能力的老年人、游民等都会被州政府安排一个法定监护人。

这一初衷本是大爱无言、感动美国的无私工作，却被玛拉看到漏洞。

她智谋布局，心机攻防，步步为营。

打通医生和安养机构，将一个个目标送到宛如监狱的养老院，连家属都无法接见。

这群老人完全沦为她的摇钱树，被肆意压榨蚕食直至掏空。

虽然手段龌龊，但在程序上，她并没有逾越法律，完全合法。

怎么做到的？

首先，医生会为她提供目标。

目标一般会出现记忆和智力下降、行为能力退化的症状。

紧接着，医生便会向法院申请一场听审会，庭上一通颠倒黑白，“她孤苦无依”“她神志不清”“她没有办法好好照顾自己”……

哦，多么可怜的人啊！

于是法官便会下达行政令， 任命玛拉为法定监护人。

当事人从头至尾没有出现，但从此刻起，这个陌生的女人已经对他的生活拥有完全的法律权力。

这招百试不爽，直到遇到珍妮弗。

珍妮弗·彼得森从各方面来说都是一个完美目标。

她除了有一丝丝糊涂外，身体非常硬朗（活的越久意味着被压榨的时间越长，一旦去世遗产就会进入继承阶段，或交由亲属或充公）。

无子无女无丈夫，没有任何在世亲人。

住在高档小区，拥有完整产权的昂贵房产。

金融工作退休，手握高额保险和收益极其可观的基金和证券。

信用极佳，没有债务、没有任何不良记录，在玛拉眼中，她就是一只坐在一窝金蛋上，肥得流油的金鹅。

这么一只肥羊送到嘴边，玛拉怎么会放过。

一顿熟悉的操作，珍妮弗被送进了养老院。

手机没收，自由受限。

这边珍妮弗惨遭囚禁，那边玛拉开始疯狂“抄家”。

她把老太太的房子翻了个底朝天，包括房子在内的所有物品均被一一标价、出售，老太太攒了大半辈子的家当比玛拉预期要多的多，

不仅如此，她还找到了意外的惊喜。

在一个隐蔽角落，玛拉发现了一把银行保险箱的钥匙。

没想到里面居然是金表、金砖，

和钻石。

关键这些钻石的品质极佳，每一颗都至少价值20万美元。

事情发展愈发出乎玛拉的预料，一个退休社畜，即便是金融领域，再有钱也不可能会到如此地步。

而最让玛拉不解的是——

为什么？

因为这很可能是不法所得！

这老太太到底是何方神圣？

原来，她的儿子是俄罗斯黑手党的头目。

她可不是什么待宰的羊羔，她是黑帮帝国的太后。

就连珍妮弗·彼得森这个身份都是伪造的。

当知道母亲被送到养老院后，黑帮老大出离愤怒。

但为了能安静迅速的解决问题，他先派出了律师上门谈判，律师直接带了15万美元现金，但玛拉狮子大开口，一张嘴就是五百万。

谈判破裂。

既然文的不行，那就来武的。

黑帮老大派出三个手下，谎借参观养老院来营救珍妮弗，不想玛拉带着警察及时赶到，营救计划也以失败告终。

玛拉逼问珍妮弗到底是方神圣，但老太太对其不屑一顾，据不透露。

但是，虎落平阳被犬欺，玛拉动用手段将老太太直接送进了精神病院。

这让孝顺的黑帮首领勃然大怒，他决定开战。

第一件事就是处决了渎职的医生。

她们这才意识到事态的严重，是硬刚到底还是保命跑路？

眼看到手的银子，玛拉会不会甘愿放弃？

想知道的小伙伴快去影片里寻找答案吧！

玛拉认为世界上只有两种人，掠食者和猎物。

在食人社会的体制下，她作为掠食的母狮子，以最泯灭良心的方式过着精致美好的生活。

她熟悉体制规则、依靠公义法槌“合法”剥削老人。

而这种利用体制漏洞掏空弱者的做法，正是本片最具冲突性的安排。

法律并非保护好人，而是保障懂法律的人。

本片真实社会事件为灵感，就是在这样的基调下左批医疗制度缺口，右批法院昏庸无能。

法官只会依据纸面做出判断，无在无当事人和第三方机构的双重认证下，让女主等一众收尸大队有了可趁之机。

要成功就必须运用特殊手段，但利益与道德之间又该怎么去取舍衡量？

本片百因必有果、天道好轮回的结尾在传达主创的价值导向的同时，告诉我们“成功”所必须做出的牺牲和可能要承担的风险。

从片中也能一窥原本出于善意的体制是如何变得邪恶，而个体又是如何在体制下被无情碾压，在无路可走的情况下，最终选择法外私刑“解决问题”。

不论是为了报复、还是安慰自我，这些决定都凸显了亟需改善的体制问题。

两个小时，高潮迭起反转不断，导演试图触及议题的目的已完整达成，但全员恶人的设定无疑决定了观众很难带入或认同片中的任何一方。

玛拉是贪婪的秃鹫，也是被侮辱的女性，她关心（监护care）一切，却又只在乎自己。

这样一个复杂的角色生生被裴姐演活了。

即便是单挑黑帮大佬这种匪夷所思的桥段，但放在她身上就是会变得合情合理、令人信服，单单为了她影后级别的演出，本片也绝对值得一看。

戳【有用】，为裴淳华打call

这个电影很有意思，黑色幽默+反讽手法，看完之后发人深省。

之前看过一本书（忘了什么名字），大概就是说社会上大量的资源掌握在少数人的手里，当你想做什么、想看什么、想买什么......都有可能不是你真实的想法，而是别人让你“想做什么、想看什么、想买什么......”。

这里说的别人就是掌握大部分社会资源的人，在金字塔顶端的人，他们以利己的操作，让买单的人心甘情愿，好像是被操作的人自己的真实意图得到了表达。

对比电影看，Marla这类人就像是金字塔顶端的人。

他们串接养老院、医生，甚至拿起了法律作为工具，进行一系列“合理合规合法”的“偷窃”行为。

包括后来黑黑联合，一个提供资本，一个提供“技术”（操作模式和具体实施），强强联合下垄集社会资源，一切都在计划之内，让不明所以的老年人心存感激、让明白所以的老年人无力反抗。

看完电影后，开始重新理解亲人们催婚。

父母、自己、儿女三代人，三条时间线。

父母在慢慢老去的过程中见证你的成长，而你又在慢慢老去的过程中见证儿女的成长，跟你在同一时间线上的是你的伴侣。

也重新理解“养儿防老”这个词，不是老人在无自理能力后一定要儿女到跟前服侍，而是在你受到不公正待遇之后，有人为你伸张正义，有人为你维权。

以下文字转发自网友“ 青山精神病院首席院长 ”的B站评理 这个片子讲了个什么故事呢？

我给你们举个例子吧！

某天你突然说阿里巴巴是你创建的，声称是马云夺走了你的财产。

没有任何资质，任何证明，任何证人，马云甚至没收到传票的情况下，法院就把阿里巴巴判给了你。

马云上门来找你，扇了你一耳光，你把监控发出去，说他是神经病。

于是精神病院的人来了，也不做鉴定，也不做评估，直接就把马云送进了精神病院。

建林听到这个消息后不爽了，气的不行，准备来收拾你。

你被建林逮到还拽的不行，说不给你一千万，就不放马云。

建林脑子气坏了，甚至都忘了随便找个心理评估师就能去精神病院把人带出来。

就在建林把你丢进万达浇筑好的地基里时，你突然爆发了绿巨人的力量，一脚踹碎地基冲了出来。

然后你还不想着跑。

你想着的是报仇。

怎么报仇？

先染个头发登记都不带登记的，就大摇大摆的走进WD总部。

然后再用出无数公司商业间谍都没有的算命大法，准确算出建林的位置。

恰好建林的保镖还都瞎了，于是你拿着根破电棍，一把破麻醉针突破了保镖重围制服了建林。

然后在众目睽睽之下，从WD总部带走了建林，丝毫不在乎那些醒来的保镖会不会来追杀你。

这是一波什么操作？

约翰威克看了都紧皱眉头的操作。

不知道过去了多久，建林从医院里醒来。

你坐在床边，一脸得意的告诉建林。

我已经把你带到了老挝，你是没有身份的无业游民，你的WD得被判给我了。

建林慌了，完全忘记了一开始他帮马云伪造的身份。

甚至都忘记了，自己还有手下还有思聪。

慌张的建林，要求和你合作。

你们一起创建了商业帝国。

这个片子说明了什么？

编剧不会写装逼的剧情，就不要写，不然到时候只剩下了尬逼，还是老尬逼。

这片子的三观能歪到让人对黑帮恨铁不成钢的程度。

开篇立意是挺新颖的，不过高质量有深度的对决应该是两个系统之间势均力敌的较量，个人意志和运气带来的逆转反而拉低了影片层次，尤其结尾用“正义一枪”草草收场，取代了犯罪系统的整体崩坏，这是对美利坚社会法制信心全无了的意思么。

个人感觉比较好的范例是《战争之王》和《绅士们》

当时看了预告，不信邪，觉得再怎么拍也不会太烂吧，演员没得说，网飞的执行肯定也差不了。

结果看完发现是scope出问题了。

不过这个锅不能光让编剧和导演背，真就是美国现在意识形态的问题。

要么让一个平凡人对抗女魔头，一步步发现她背后产业链的丑陋与黑暗，发现无法用正常法律途径解决问题，只能按结局那样解决掉。

彻底拍成令人窒息绝望的面对现实的片子。

要么就按预告里的思路彻底走娱乐路线，以恶制恶，好好用战斗民族的铁拳惩罚一下万恶的资本家。

既想要娱乐片的爽感，又想要写实和深度，结果就是既让观众不爽，又被观众批判肤浅、侮辱智商。

其实我估计编剧和导演也挺难的，在美国当今娱乐圈极左的氛围里，如果按传统思路让俄国黑帮灭掉女主是行不通的，女主的智商从政治正确的角度来说必须碾压所有人，但女主丧尽天良的行为从基本道德层面又不得不被惩罚，想讨好所有的观众，结果就成了这么别扭憋屈的剧本。

演员演得好，反而恶化了剧本的问题。

黑帮母亲演技爆炸，让人坚信也让人期待女主会死得很惨；小恶魔演技爆炸，让人坚信惹恼了本恶魔后果很严重；裴姐演技爆炸，让人坚信这女的不得好死；就连一众配角也演技爆炸，把人的期待值拔高到200%，结果结局和他们都没关系，他们演了八十分钟的寂寞。

真白瞎了配置。

ಥ_ಥ前三分之二还是挺好看的，不忍心，又给加了一颗星。

观影体验有惊悚、痛恨女主、三观不正、不舒服不痛快，但是仔细想想，就是赤裸裸的现实。

中国已快速进入老年社会，大量的独生子女让我们没办法把养老寄托在孩子身上。

以房养老、资产托管养老，已经是现实。

养老产业将是中国未来最大的朝阳产业，无数资本大鳄和机构已经开始全面布局。

即使在法治环境下，让那些大鳄和狮子有点善心，基本不可能。

例如股市，无数大佬闪耀上市，两茬韭菜一割，然后暴雷开始。

当然，这丝毫不影响盆满钵满的狮子们继续到处宣传：只要努力，你一定能和我一样！

坚信公平竞争的我们当了一辈子绵羊，幸运的话，也许可以体面退休，有两套房，有一份退休金。

退休前十年，幸运的话，可能还有诗和远方，然后，逐渐痴呆和不能自理一定会拥抱我们。

为了和谐社会和我们的平安幸福，如果不能麻烦子女，我们的晚年也只能托付给养老机构，资产和退休金只能托付给养老机构打理。

绵羊老了，还是绵羊，我们也不可能有一个黑帮大佬儿子。

很多年轻人对这个片子可能无感，甚至觉得这个故事太可笑。

但是中老年观众一定会被惊悚到，而且即使你知道养老院门口站着腹黑女主，你也无法逃避，因为这就是无奈现实。

在影片中，痛恨女主虐待母亲的小恶魔选择了与女主和解，共创伟业。

现实中难道不是这样？

金钱的诱惑谁能拒绝？

有些观众纠结腹黑女主最后是不是必须死，为了过审才安排意外被枪击死亡。

现实生活中，女主这样的人一定是光彩动人的成功人士，站在人生巅峰，他们多数都活得特别好。

在中国，养老问题才开始出现。

本片导演对现实的关注和思考让人赞赏，其实更需要ZF机构关注养老问题。

每个观众可以脑补自己进了一个风景如画的养老机构中的情景，被喂饭被喂药被翻身被放风，你清楚一切但是没办法跟偶尔来一趟的子女讲清楚，何况你的子女也不是小恶魔。

非亲非故，别人愿意照顾你的唯一理由不就是你的退休金和房子嘛！

所以，本片是黑色惊悚现实主义的好作品！

哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，无儿无女的老人，就是待宰的猪，我三十岁就想到了这一点，哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，我会留给子孙一点够用的自己的存款资本，然后剩下的必须自己挥霍一空！

如果不孝顺，那算我教育失败（任何投资都不是百分百成功的，你得承认这点，但我狼爸虎妈的教育方法我不信能教育出不肖子孙，我跟你们讲生孩子是自己的累赘负担观念不同。

我认为生儿育女本质，就是一种投资！

播种开花结果，最终哺育父母，也就是我自己，哈哈哈这才是终极奥义，你们不婚不育实际上丧失了最大最好的人生退路，我用一辈子跟你赌）我会不留一分钱给他们，全部自己挥霍，人都是怕死的，网上小年轻还老推崇安乐死，实际上自杀都是最懦弱最无能走投无路的人才会去做的，但凡有能活下去的方法，人，一定会想尽办法活下去，这就是人的本性！

自古以来，自杀的人都是少数，安乐死的人更是少之又少，谁也不愿意放弃享受生命的最后一刻，除非痛苦大过活着！

你们这群小屁孩竟然说老了失能了就安乐死，想的太简单了逗比，真到那时候，只要痛苦不大于活下去的精力，没人会想死的嘿嘿。

我都想干女主这行了，真真稳赚不赔

被imp吸引进去看这部戏，开头10分钟还不错，完全踩到我仅有的几个道德底线雷达，立即开始厌恶女主的poke face和她的勾当。

但因随即看到shit哥，就自我暗示说，可能之后会黑色幽默的很开心哦。

结果，结果，结果怎么是这种烂戏！

情节硬伤什么的都不说了，对话白目无聊，情节节奏拖沓，就连摄影都那么直白，真心想不出来有啥可取之处.....然后居然被营销成什么大女主反英雄爽剧，爽毛啊，都谁在爽，你说的都谁在爽！

三观怎么可以那么歪！

还给我营销成女权related，太邪恶了！

白白浪费imp的全裸镜头、shit哥30年打造的专业贪污人设，和阿嬷迷离的眼神以及矫健的步伐。

另吐槽这莫名其妙的lesbian setting，莫名其妙一堆情爱场景，特别讨厌这种自作聪明的迎合，太烂了啦。

连看到那些觉得这部戏都还好，这部戏女主太帅气的评论都觉得生气！

太生气了！！！！

这部电影简直给les招黑。

看完我无语了半个小时，找qq哭诉无力，despeate.女主专门寻找身体情况欠佳同时又无依无靠的老年人下手，通过并不是那么合法的手段令自己成为他们的法定监护人，将他们送进疗养院，之后便可接手和变卖他们的财产和房产，再将所得据为己有。

有次绑票绑到黑社会老大的妈妈身上，然后就两方博弈了。

结果黑社会老大没干掉女主最后让反绑了。

哇裴淳华的演技真的让人很恨这个人，但是这个价值观真的很欺骗也很无厘头。

黑社会老大怎么可能处理不干净女主，甚至在女主家没有处理好女主的女朋友，女主一回到家女朋友就醒了，我：？？？？？？？？？？？？？？

整部片子都围绕着：这个社会公平竞争是不可能出人头地的，对于普通人就应该不走寻常路，抓住一切机会。

但如果这些机会是sin呢，无间道里说出来混迟早是要还的，哪有那么巧的事情什么都让你赚了，又没堕入无间地狱。

阶级的跨升必然经历着苦痛与艰难，没有什么是理所当然的，改变都需要努力，也并不那么容易。

没有必要因为没得到所以欺骗自己给自己编造理由，然后堕入这种爽文中，告诉自己，只有坏人才能赢，所以我没赢是因为我的良知。

这种无关痛痒的自我安慰，真的才是fucking low.如果你想要fucking rich,就必须fucking hard-working,到最后fucking painful win.